Back to Search
Start Over
A feces collection paper does not enhance participation in a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program: randomized clinical trial.
- Source :
-
European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) [Eur J Cancer Prev] 2013 Jul; Vol. 22 (4), pp. 299-304. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Discomfort with the collection of a stool sample is a frequently cited barrier for participation in fecal test-based colorectal cancer screening. The objective was to evaluate whether a feces collection paper enhances participation in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening program. Randomized clinical trial. Second round of a biannual Dutch FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program pilot. A random sample of 10 265 individuals from the general population, men and women aged 50-75 years at an average risk for colorectal cancer, was eligible for participation. Invitees were randomized to an FIT-only group (n=5136) or an FIT in combination with a feces collection paper group (n=5129). The main outcome measure was participation in screening. Overall, 5367 tests of 10 265 were returned (52%). In the FIT-only group, 2694 tests were returned [52%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 51-54%] versus 2673 tests in the collection paper group (52%; 95% CI: 51-54%). This difference in the participation rate was not significant (relative risk: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97-1.04). A feces collection paper does not increase participation rates in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening. Future studies should explore other ways of facilitating participation in colorectal cancer screening programs.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1473-5709
- Volume :
- 22
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23169243
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32835b3882