Back to Search
Start Over
Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry.
- Source :
-
Journal of the American College of Cardiology [J Am Coll Cardiol] 2012 Nov 13; Vol. 60 (20), pp. 2103-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Oct 17. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Objectives: This study sought to examine patterns of follow-up invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularization (REV) after coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).<br />Background: CCTA is a noninvasive test that permits direct visualization of the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Post-CCTA patterns of follow-up ICA and REV are incompletely defined.<br />Methods: We examined 15,207 intermediate likelihood patients from 8 sites in 6 countries; these patients were without known CAD, underwent CCTA, and were followed up for 2.3 ± 1.2 years for all-cause mortality. Coronary artery stenosis was judged as obstructive when ≥50% stenosis was present. A multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate ICA use. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate all-cause mortality.<br />Results: During follow-up, ICA rates for patients with no CAD to mild CAD according to CCTA were low (2.5% and 8.3%), with similarly low rates of REV (0.3% and 2.5%). Most ICA procedures (79%) occurred ≤3 months of CCTA. Obstructive CAD was associated with higher rates of ICA and REV for 1-vessel (44.3% and 28.0%), 2-vessel (53.3% and 43.6%), and 3-vessel (69.4% and 66.8%) CAD, respectively. For patients with <50% stenosis, early ICA rates were elevated; over the entirety of follow-up, predictors of ICA were mild left main, mild proximal CAD, respectively, or higher coronary calcium scores. In patients with <50% stenosis, the relative hazard for death was 2.2 (p = 0.011) for ICA versus no ICA. Conversely, for patients with CAD, the relative hazard for death was 0.61 for ICA versus no ICA (p = 0.047).<br />Conclusions: These findings support the concept that CCTA may be used effectively as a gatekeeper to ICA.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Coronary Artery Disease mortality
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Revascularization mortality
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Registries
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Survival Rate
Coronary Angiography methods
Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging
Myocardial Revascularization methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1558-3597
- Volume :
- 60
- Issue :
- 20
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 23083780
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.062