Back to Search Start Over

Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry.

Authors :
Shaw LJ
Hausleiter J
Achenbach S
Al-Mallah M
Berman DS
Budoff MJ
Cademartiri F
Callister TQ
Chang HJ
Kim YJ
Cheng VY
Chow BJ
Cury RC
Delago AJ
Dunning AL
Feuchtner GM
Hadamitzky M
Karlsberg RP
Kaufmann PA
Leipsic J
Lin FY
Chinnaiyan KM
Maffei E
Raff GL
Villines TC
Labounty T
Gomez MJ
Min JK
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology [J Am Coll Cardiol] 2012 Nov 13; Vol. 60 (20), pp. 2103-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Oct 17.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to examine patterns of follow-up invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularization (REV) after coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).<br />Background: CCTA is a noninvasive test that permits direct visualization of the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Post-CCTA patterns of follow-up ICA and REV are incompletely defined.<br />Methods: We examined 15,207 intermediate likelihood patients from 8 sites in 6 countries; these patients were without known CAD, underwent CCTA, and were followed up for 2.3 ± 1.2 years for all-cause mortality. Coronary artery stenosis was judged as obstructive when ≥50% stenosis was present. A multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate ICA use. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate all-cause mortality.<br />Results: During follow-up, ICA rates for patients with no CAD to mild CAD according to CCTA were low (2.5% and 8.3%), with similarly low rates of REV (0.3% and 2.5%). Most ICA procedures (79%) occurred ≤3 months of CCTA. Obstructive CAD was associated with higher rates of ICA and REV for 1-vessel (44.3% and 28.0%), 2-vessel (53.3% and 43.6%), and 3-vessel (69.4% and 66.8%) CAD, respectively. For patients with <50% stenosis, early ICA rates were elevated; over the entirety of follow-up, predictors of ICA were mild left main, mild proximal CAD, respectively, or higher coronary calcium scores. In patients with <50% stenosis, the relative hazard for death was 2.2 (p = 0.011) for ICA versus no ICA. Conversely, for patients with CAD, the relative hazard for death was 0.61 for ICA versus no ICA (p = 0.047).<br />Conclusions: These findings support the concept that CCTA may be used effectively as a gatekeeper to ICA.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1558-3597
Volume :
60
Issue :
20
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23083780
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.062