Back to Search
Start Over
Aflibercept and Docetaxel versus Docetaxel alone after platinum failure in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, controlled phase III trial.
- Source :
-
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2012 Oct 10; Vol. 30 (29), pp. 3640-7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Sep 10. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To compare the efficacy of aflibercept (ziv-aflibercept), a recombinant human fusion protein targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, with or without docetaxel in platinum-pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.<br />Patients and Methods: In this international, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 913 patients were randomly assigned to (ziv-)aflibercept 6 mg/kg intravenous (IV; n = 456) or IV placebo (n = 457), both administered every 3 weeks and in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Other efficacy outcomes, safety, and immunogenicity were also assessed.<br />Results: Patient characteristics were balanced between arms; 12.3% of patients had received prior bevacizumab. (Ziv-)Aflibercept did not improve OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.17; stratified log-rank P = .90). The median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.6 months) for (ziv-)aflibercept and 10.4 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.9 months) for placebo. In exploratory analyses, median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 5.6 months) for (ziv-)aflibercept versus 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 4.3 months) for placebo (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94; P = .0035); overall response rate was 23.3% of evaluable patients (95% CI, 19.1% to 27.4%) in the (ziv-)aflibercept arm versus 8.9% (95% CI, 6.1% to 11.6%; P < .001) in the placebo arm. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurring more frequently in the (ziv-)aflibercept arm versus the placebo arm were neutropenia (28.0% v 21.1%, respectively), fatigue (11.1% v 4.2%, respectively), stomatitis (8.8% v 0.7%, respectively), and hypertension (7.3% v 0.9%, respectively).<br />Conclusion: The addition of (ziv-)aflibercept to standard docetaxel therapy did not improve OS. In exploratory analyses, secondary efficacy end points did seem to be improved in the (ziv-)aflibercept arm. The study regimen was associated with increased toxicities, consistent with known anti-VEGF and chemotherapy-induced events.
- Subjects :
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality
Confidence Intervals
Disease-Free Survival
Docetaxel
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lung Neoplasms mortality
Male
Maximum Tolerated Dose
Neoplasm Invasiveness pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Platinum therapeutic use
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
Recombinant Fusion Proteins therapeutic use
Risk Assessment
Survival Analysis
Taxoids therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology
Lung Neoplasms drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms pathology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-7755
- Volume :
- 30
- Issue :
- 29
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22965962
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6932