Cite
[Comparison between binocular, open-field auto ref/keratometer and conventional autorefractor].
MLA
Wan, Xiu-hua, et al. “[Comparison between Binocular, Open-Field Auto Ref/Keratometer and Conventional Autorefractor].” [Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi] Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 48, no. 6, June 2012, pp. 519–23. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=cmedm&AN=22943807&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.
APA
Wan, X., Lin, Z., Cai, X., Qiao, L., Yang, X., Wang, N., & Liang, Y. (2012). [Comparison between binocular, open-field auto ref/keratometer and conventional autorefractor]. [Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi] Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology, 48(6), 519–523.
Chicago
Wan, Xiu-hua, Zhong Lin, Xiao-gu Cai, Li-ya Qiao, Xiao-dong Yang, Ning-li Wang, and Yuan-bo Liang. 2012. “[Comparison between Binocular, Open-Field Auto Ref/Keratometer and Conventional Autorefractor].” [Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi] Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology 48 (6): 519–23. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=cmedm&AN=22943807&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.