Back to Search
Start Over
A comparison of civil patients and incompetent defendants: pre and post deinstitutionalization.
- Source :
-
The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law [Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law] 1990; Vol. 18 (4), pp. 393-403. - Publication Year :
- 1990
-
Abstract
- There has been a great deal of speculation that deinstitutionalization has resulted in the criminalization of the mentally ill. Using two samples of defendants found incompetent to stand trial (IST) and two samples of civil patients randomly selected from five states, pre and post deinstitutionalization, this research compares changes in their mental health and arrest histories. After deinstitutionalization, fewer and less dramatic differences in the arrest and mental health histories were evident between ISTs and civil patients. Both patient samples displayed significant increases in prior hospitalization and arrest histories. Among the civil patients there was a significant increase in the frequency and seriousness of criminal activity. There was no evidence that IST commitments are being expanded to hospitalize the nondangerous mentally ill no longer subject to civil commitment.
- Subjects :
- Civil Rights trends
Cohort Studies
Commitment of Mentally Ill trends
Dangerous Behavior
Deinstitutionalization trends
Expert Testimony legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
United States
Civil Rights legislation & jurisprudence
Commitment of Mentally Ill legislation & jurisprudence
Deinstitutionalization legislation & jurisprudence
Insanity Defense statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0091-634X
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 2289029