Back to Search
Start Over
Reoperations on the pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft after the Ross procedure: An update on the German Dutch Ross Registry.
- Source :
-
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery [J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg] 2012 Oct; Vol. 144 (4), pp. 813-21; discussion 821-3. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Aug 09. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Objectives: Reinterventions after the Ross procedure are a concern for patients and treating physicians. The scope of the present report was to provide an update on the reinterventions observed in the large patient population of the German-Dutch Ross Registry.<br />Patients and Methods: From 1988 to 2011, 2023 patients (age, 39.05 ± 16.5 years; male patients, 1502; adults, 1642) underwent a Ross procedure in 13 centers. The mean follow-up was 7.1 ± 4.6 years (range, 0-22 years; 13,168 patient-years).<br />Results: In the adult population, 120 autograft reinterventions in 113 patients (1.03%/patient-year) and 76 homograft reinterventions in 67 patients (0.65%/patient-year) and, in the pediatric population, 14 autograft reinterventions in 13 patients (0.91%/patient-year) and 42 homograft reinterventions in 31 patients (2.72%/patient-year) were observed. Of the autograft and homograft reinterventions, 17.9% and 21.2% were performed because of endocarditis, respectively. The subcoronary technique in the adult population resulted in significantly superior autograft durability (freedom from autograft reintervention: 97% at 10 years and 91% at 12 years; P < .001). The root replacement technique without root reinforcement (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.1) and the presence of pure aortic insufficiency preoperatively (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.5) were statistically significant predictors for a shorter time to reoperation. The center volume had a significant influence on the long-term results. The freedom from homograft reoperation for the adults and pediatric population was 97% and 87% at 5 years and 93% and 79% at 12 years, respectively (P < .001), with younger recipient and donor age being significant predictors of a shorter time to homograft reoperation.<br />Conclusions: The autograft principle remains a valid option for young patients requiring aortic valve replacement. The risk of reoperation depends largely on the surgical technique used and the preoperative hemodynamics. Center experience and expertise also influence the long-term results. Adequate endocarditis prophylaxis might further reduce the need for reoperation.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aortic Valve physiopathology
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Germany
Heart Valve Diseases mortality
Heart Valve Diseases physiopathology
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Hemodynamics
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Netherlands
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications mortality
Postoperative Complications physiopathology
Proportional Hazards Models
Registries
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Survival Analysis
Transplantation, Autologous
Transplantation, Homologous
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Aortic Valve surgery
Bioprosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Heart Valve Diseases surgery
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Postoperative Complications surgery
Pulmonary Artery transplantation
Pulmonary Valve transplantation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-685X
- Volume :
- 144
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22883549
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.005