Back to Search
Start Over
Primary care utilization and mental health diagnoses among adult patients requiring interpreters: a retrospective cohort study.
- Source :
-
Journal of general internal medicine [J Gen Intern Med] 2013 Mar; Vol. 28 (3), pp. 386-91. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Jul 11. - Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Background: Patients requiring interpreters may utilize the health care system differently or more frequently than patients not requiring interpreters; those with mental health issues may be particularly difficult to diagnose.<br />Objective: To determine whether adult patients requiring interpreters exhibit different health care utilization patterns and rates of mental health diagnoses than their counterparts.<br />Design: Retrospective cohort study examining patient visits to primary care (PC), express care (EC), or the emergency department (ED) of a large group practice within 1 year.<br />Patients: Adult outpatients (n = 63,525) with at least one visit within the study interval and information regarding interpreter need.<br />Main Measures: Mean visit counts, counts of mental disorders, and somatic symptom diagnoses between patients requiring interpreters (IS patients) and not requiring interpreters (non-IS patients).<br />Key Results: IS patients (n = 1,566) had a higher mean number of visits overall (3.10 vs. 2.52), in PC (2.54 vs. 1.95), and in ED (0.53 vs. 0.44) than non-IS patients (all p < 0.01). IS patients had a lower mean number of visits in EC than non-IS patients (0.03 vs. 0.13; p < 0.01). Interpreter need remained a significant predictor of visit count in multivariate analyses including age, sex, insurance, and clinical complexity. A greater proportion of IS patients were high utilizers (10+ visits) than non-IS patients (3.6 % vs. 1.7 %; p < 0.01). IS patients had a lower frequency of mental health diagnoses (13.9 % vs. 16.7 %), but a higher frequency of diagnoses recognized as potential somatic symptoms including diseases of the nervous (29.3 % vs. 24.2 %), digestive (22.6 % vs. 14.5 %), and musculoskeletal systems (43.2 % vs. 34.5 %), and ill-defined conditions (61 % vs. 49.9 %), all p < 0.01.<br />Conclusions: IS patients visited PC more often than their counterparts and were more often high utilizers of care. Two sources of high utilization, mental health diagnoses and somatic symptoms, differed appreciably between our populations and may be contributing factors.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Female
Health Services Accessibility statistics & numerical data
Health Services Needs and Demand statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Mental Disorders therapy
Middle Aged
Minnesota epidemiology
Outpatients psychology
Patient Acceptance of Health Care ethnology
Patient Acceptance of Health Care statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Language
Mental Disorders ethnology
Office Visits statistics & numerical data
Primary Health Care statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1525-1497
- Volume :
- 28
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of general internal medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22782282
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2159-5