Back to Search Start Over

Laparoscopic splenectomy using pneumoperitoneum or gasless abdominal wall lifting: a 15-year single institution experience.

Authors :
Hyodo M
Sata N
Koizumi M
Sakuma Y
Kurihara K
Lefor AT
Ohki J
Nagai H
Yasuda Y
Source :
Asian journal of endoscopic surgery [Asian J Endosc Surg] 2012 May; Vol. 5 (2), pp. 63-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Dec 30.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic splenectomy using pneumoperitoneum has been performed since 1992. The gasless abdominal wall-lifting method for laparoscopic splenectomy was introduced as an alternative. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare results using the two techniques.<br />Methods: Between 1995 and 2010, 54 patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy at a single institution; 30 underwent the procedure using the gasless technique and 24 using pneumoperitoneum. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex or BMI, but more patients underwent concurrent operations in the pneumoperitoneum group. The abdominal wall-lift system with subcutaneous K-wires was used for the gasless method.<br />Results: Intraoperative blood loss was similar in the two groups (193.0 ± 196.7 mL gasless, 217.3 ± 296.6 mL pneumoperitoneum; P > 0.05), but operative time (182.1 ± 92.1 min, 135.1 ± 46.1 min; P < 0.05), and resected spleen weight (306.1 ± 297.7 g, 138 ± 81.0 g; P < 0.05) were significantly different. In the gasless group, additional procedures included conversion (n = 1), mini-laparotomy (n = 2), and CO(2) insufflation (n = 2). Excluding the concurrent living-related kidney donor patients, hospital stay was similar (6.9 ± 2.5 days, 6.3 ± 2.0 days, P > 0.05).<br />Conclusion: Although gasless laparoscopic splenectomy is feasible, there are disadvantages, particularly the restricted operative working space in some patients. These results suggest that either technique may be used on an individual basis in patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy.<br /> (© 2011 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1758-5910
Volume :
5
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22776366
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00124.x