Back to Search Start Over

Febrile neutropenia incidence and hematological toxicity with the FEC100-docetaxel regimen in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors :
Cousin S
Le Rhun E
Mailliez A
Fournier C
Bonneterre J
Source :
Bulletin du cancer [Bull Cancer] 2012 Jul-Aug; Vol. 99 (7-8), pp. 75-80.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients improves survival outcomes. However, its most common acute toxicity is myelosuppression, which can reduce the delivered dose and compromise the survival benefit. Because FEC100-docetaxel (FEC100-D) is a common protocol for ESBC, we evaluated its febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence and the role of its hematological toxicity on the individual relative dose-intensity (RDI).<br />Patients and Methods: It is a French single-center, observational, retrospective study. Patients received adjuvant/neoadjuvant FEC100-D treatment, without primary prophylaxis by granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF). The neutrophil count the day before the planned chemotherapy cycle had to be over 1,500.mm(-3) for the treatment to be administered. Data collected included: date and dose of chemotherapy cycles, FN and high grade of hematological toxicity occurrence for each course, G-CSF prescription.<br />Results: One thousand, seven hundred and fifty-seven cycles in 284 patients were delivered. FN was observed in 4.9% (n = 14) of the patients, without hospitalizations or deaths after. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 5.8% of the cycles, during the first cycle in 40% of cases. Seventeen percent of our patients received less than 85% of RDI.<br />Conclusion: The hematotoxicity of this treatment is acceptable. The risk of FN is low. No G-CSF primary prophylaxis is needed without additional risk factor.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1769-6917
Volume :
99
Issue :
7-8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Bulletin du cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22713627
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1684/bdc.2012.1607