Back to Search Start Over

Performance evaluation of Siemens ADVIA Centaur and Roche MODULAR Analytics E170 Total 25-OH Vitamin D assays.

Authors :
Chen Y
Kinney L
Božović A
Smith H
Tarr H
Diamandis EP
LeBlanc A
Source :
Clinical biochemistry [Clin Biochem] 2012 Nov; Vol. 45 (16-17), pp. 1485-90. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Jun 13.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the newly developed Roche MODULAR Analytics E170 Total Vitamin D and the Siemens ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total assays.<br />Materials and Methods: Assays were evaluated using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute protocols. Split patient samples were compared with LC-MS/MS and DiaSorin LIAISON assays (n=79 including 15 specimens with detectable endogenous 25-OH vitamin D(2)). Assay accuracy was also evaluated using the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) samples.<br />Results: The ADVIA Centaur and E170 assays demonstrated maximum total CVs of 14.1% and 5.9%, respectively. Both showed excellent linearity (R(2)>0.99). The ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated interference with bilirubin at 800 μmol/L, hemolysis at 1.25 g/L, and triglycerides at 2.8 mmol/L. Compared to LC-MS/MS, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated a R(2) value of 0.893, average bias of -8.8%; the E170 assay an R(2) value of 0.872, average bias of 14.3% with underestimation of 25-OH vitamin D(2). Compared to the LIAISON assay, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated an R(2) value of 0.781, average bias of -17.3%; the E170 assay an R(2) value of 0.823, average bias of 11.4%. The ADVIA Centaur and E170 assays demonstrated a biases of <20% in 10/10 and 8/10 DEQAS samples, respectively.<br />Conclusions: The ADVIA Centaur and E170 vitamin D assays demonstrated acceptable linearity, imprecision, and accuracy. The E170 assay demonstrated consistent underestimation of 25-OH vitamin D(2) levels. Compared with LC-MS/MS, the ADVIA Centaur assay demonstrated a higher R(2) value and a smaller average bias than the E170 assay.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-2933
Volume :
45
Issue :
16-17
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical biochemistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22705028
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.002