Back to Search
Start Over
A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.
- Source :
-
Clinical radiology [Clin Radiol] 2012 Oct; Vol. 67 (10), pp. 976-81. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 May 23. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Aim: To measure the change in diagnostic accuracy of conventional film-screen mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with the addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in women recalled for assessment following routine screening.<br />Materials and Methods: Ethics approval for the study was granted. Women recalled for assessment following routine screening with screen-film mammography were invited to participate. Participants underwent bilateral, two-view FFDM and two-view DBT. Readers scored each lesion separately for probability of malignancy on screen-film mammography, FFDM, and then DBT. The scores were compared with the presence or absence of malignancy based on the final histopathology outcome.<br />Results: Seven hundred and thirty-eight women participated (93.2% recruitment rate). Following assessment 204 (26.8%) were diagnosed as malignant (147 invasive and 57 in-situ tumours), 286 (37.68%) as benign, and 269 (35.4%) as normal. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by using receiving operating characteristic (ROC) and measurement of area under the curve (AUC). The AUC values demonstrated a significant (p = 0.0001) improvement in the diagnostic accuracy with the addition of DBT combined with FFDM and film-screen mammography (AUC = 0.9671) when compared to FFDM plus film-screen mammography (AUC = 0.8949) and film-screen mammography alone (AUC = 0.7882). The effect was significantly greater for soft-tissue lesions [AUC was 0.9905 with the addition of DBT and AUC was 0.9201 for FFDM with film-screen mammography combined (p = 0.0001)] compared to microcalcification [with the addition of DBT (AUC = 0.7920) and for FFDM with film-screen mammography combined (AUC = 0.7843; p = 0.3182)].<br />Conclusion: The addition of DBT increases the accuracy of mammography compared to FFDM and film-screen mammography combined and film-screen mammography alone in the assessment of screen-detected soft-tissue mammographic abnormalities.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Breast Neoplasms epidemiology
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Prevalence
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
United Kingdom epidemiology
Young Adult
Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Mammography statistics & numerical data
Radiographic Image Enhancement methods
X-Ray Film statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1365-229X
- Volume :
- 67
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22625656
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2012.03.009