Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of dementia follow-up care by memory clinics or general practitioners: randomised controlled trial.

Authors :
Meeuwsen EJ
Melis RJ
Van Der Aa GC
Golüke-Willemse GA
De Leest BJ
Van Raak FH
Schölzel-Dorenbos CJ
Verheijen DC
Verhey FR
Visser MC
Wolfs CA
Adang EM
Olde Rikkert MG
Source :
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) [BMJ] 2012 May 15; Vol. 344, pp. e3086. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 May 15.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of post-diagnosis dementia treatment and coordination of care by memory clinics compared with general practitioners.<br />Design: Multicentre randomised controlled trial.<br />Setting: Nine memory clinics and 159 general practitioners in the Netherlands.<br />Participants: 175 patients with a new diagnosis of mild to moderate dementia living in the community and their informal caregivers.<br />Interventions: Usual care provided by memory clinic or general practitioner.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Caregiver rated quality of life of the patient measured with the quality of life in Alzheimer's disease instrument and self perceived burden of the informal caregiver measured with the sense of competence questionnaire (intention to treat analysis).<br />Results: The quality of life of the patients in the memory clinic group was 0.5 (95% confidence interval -0.7 to 1.6) points higher than in the general practitioner group. Caregivers' burden was 2.4 (-5.8 to 1.0) points lower in the memory clinic group than in the general practitioner group.<br />Conclusion: No evidence was found that memory clinics were more effective than general practitioners with regard to post-diagnosis treatment and coordination care for patients with dementia. Without further evidence on the effectiveness of these modalities, other arguments, such as cost minimisation, patients' preferences, or regional health service planning, can determine which type of dementia care is offered.<br />Trial Registration: Clinical trials NCT00554047.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1756-1833
Volume :
344
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22589500
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3086