Back to Search
Start Over
Acute esophagus toxicity in lung cancer patients after intensity modulated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy.
Acute esophagus toxicity in lung cancer patients after intensity modulated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy.
- Source :
-
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics [Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys] 2012 Oct 01; Vol. 84 (2), pp. e223-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 May 05. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the dose-effect relation between acute esophageal toxicity (AET) and the dose-volume parameters of the esophagus after intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).<br />Patients and Methods: One hundred thirty-nine patients with inoperable NSCLC treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy were prospectively analyzed. The fractionation scheme was 66 Gy in 24 fractions. All patients received concurrently a daily dose of cisplatin (6 mg/m(2)). Maximum AET was scored according to Common Toxicity Criteria 3.0. Dose-volume parameters V5 to V70, D(mean) and D(max) of the esophagus were calculated. A logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the dose-effect relation between these parameters and grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 AET. The outcome was compared with the clinically used esophagus V35 prediction model for grade ≥ 2 after radical 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) treatment.<br />Results: In our patient group, 9% did not experience AET, and 31% experienced grade 1 AET, 38% grade 2 AET, and 22% grade 3 AET. The incidence of grade 2 and grade 3 AET was not different from that in patients treated with CCRT using 3DCRT. The V50 turned out to be the most significant dosimetric predictor for grade ≥ 3 AET (P=.012). The derived V50 model was shown to predict grade ≥ 2 AET significantly better than the clinical V35 model (P<.001).<br />Conclusions: For NSCLC patients treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy, the V50 was identified as most accurate predictor of grade ≥ 3 AET. There was no difference in the incidence of grade ≥ 2 AET between 3DCRT and IMRT in patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology
Chemoradiotherapy methods
Cisplatin administration & dosage
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Esophagus diagnostic imaging
Esophagus drug effects
Female
Heart diagnostic imaging
Humans
Lung diagnostic imaging
Lung radiation effects
Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Organs at Risk diagnostic imaging
Prospective Studies
Radiography
Spinal Cord diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung therapy
Chemoradiotherapy adverse effects
Esophagus radiation effects
Lung Neoplasms therapy
Organs at Risk radiation effects
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-355X
- Volume :
- 84
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22560551
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.027