Back to Search Start Over

Large-scale population analysis challenges the current criteria for the molecular diagnosis of fascioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

Authors :
Scionti I
Greco F
Ricci G
Govi M
Arashiro P
Vercelli L
Berardinelli A
Angelini C
Antonini G
Cao M
Di Muzio A
Moggio M
Morandi L
Ricci E
Rodolico C
Ruggiero L
Santoro L
Siciliano G
Tomelleri G
Trevisan CP
Galluzzi G
Wright W
Zatz M
Tupler R
Source :
American journal of human genetics [Am J Hum Genet] 2012 Apr 06; Vol. 90 (4), pp. 628-35.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a common hereditary myopathy causally linked to reduced numbers (≤8) of 3.3 kilobase D4Z4 tandem repeats at 4q35. However, because individuals carrying D4Z4-reduced alleles and no FSHD and patients with FSHD and no short allele have been observed, additional markers have been proposed to support an FSHD molecular diagnosis. In particular a reduction in the number of D4Z4 elements combined with the 4A(159/161/168)PAS haplotype (which provides the possibility of expressing DUX4) is currently used as the genetic signature uniquely associated with FSHD. Here, we analyzed these DNA elements in more than 800 Italian and Brazilian samples of normal individuals unrelated to any FSHD patients. We find that 3% of healthy subjects carry alleles with a reduced number (4-8) of D4Z4 repeats on chromosome 4q and that one-third of these alleles, 1.3%, occur in combination with the 4A161PAS haplotype. We also systematically characterized the 4q35 haplotype in 253 unrelated FSHD patients. We find that only 127 of them (50.1%) carry alleles with 1-8 D4Z4 repeats associated with 4A161PAS, whereas the remaining FSHD probands carry different haplotypes or alleles with a greater number of D4Z4 repeats. The present study shows that the current genetic signature of FSHD is a common polymorphism and that only half of FSHD probands carry this molecular signature. Our results suggest that the genetic basis of FSHD, which is remarkably heterogeneous, should be revisited, because this has important implications for genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis of at-risk families.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-6605
Volume :
90
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of human genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22482803
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.019