Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing epidural, patient-controlled intravenous morphine, and continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open abdominal surgery.

MLA

Tilleul, P., et al. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Epidural, Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine, and Continuous Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Management after Open Abdominal Surgery.” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 108, no. 6, June 2012, pp. 998–1005. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes091.

APA

Tilleul, P., Aissou, M., Bocquet, F., Thiriat, N., le Grelle, O., Burke, M. J., Hutton, J., & Beaussier, M. (2012). Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing epidural, patient-controlled intravenous morphine, and continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain management after open abdominal surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 108(6), 998–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes091

Chicago

Tilleul, P, M Aissou, F Bocquet, N Thiriat, O le Grelle, M J Burke, J Hutton, and M Beaussier. 2012. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Epidural, Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine, and Continuous Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Management after Open Abdominal Surgery.” British Journal of Anaesthesia 108 (6): 998–1005. doi:10.1093/bja/aes091.