Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of selective liver denervation methods.

Authors :
Cucchiaro G
Yamaguchi Y
Mills E
Kuhn CM
Anthony DC
Branum GD
Epstein R
Meyers WC
Source :
The American journal of physiology [Am J Physiol] 1990 Nov; Vol. 259 (5 Pt 1), pp. G781-5.
Publication Year :
1990

Abstract

This study compares four methods of hepatic denervation and defines the rate and physiological significance of reinnervation. Five groups of rats were prepared: 10 underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. In nine rats a 90% aqueous phenol solution was applied circumferentially to the portal vein. Thirteen rats underwent microsurgical denervation; 28 received different doses of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-HODA) administered as a single intraportal injection [50 (n = 10), 75 (n = 6), and 100 mg/kg (n = 6)]. Twelve rats were studied as controls. Rats were killed 1, 4, and 8 wk after surgery to determine liver tissue content of norepinephrine (NE). Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in response to hepatic nerve stimulation, which was supramaximum in intensity and frequency, were measured before rats were killed. NE content in controls ranged from 121 to 204 ng/g and MAP increased by 30-38 mmHg after electrical stimulation. At 1, 4, and 8 wk after treatment the liver NE content was less than 1, 2.3, and 20.2 ng/g in the transplant group; less than 1, 2.7, 4.1 ng/g in the phenol group; and 17.2, less than 1, and 3 ng/g in the surgically denervated group. In the 6-HODA group, values were 18.9, 47, and 61.5 ng/g (50 mg/kg); 5.7, 20.2, and 15 ng/g (75 mg/kg); and 7.7, 2.5, and 17.5 ng/g (100 mg/kg). When the level of NE was undetectable, MAP increase after stimulation was 0-18% that of controls. When NE content was 15-23% of normal, MAP increased 49-62% regardless of the denervation technique.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0002-9513
Volume :
259
Issue :
5 Pt 1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The American journal of physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
2240220
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1990.259.5.G781