Back to Search Start Over

Obesity increases precision errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors :
Knapp KM
Welsman JR
Hopkins SJ
Fogelman I
Blake GM
Source :
Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry [J Clin Densitom] 2012 Jul-Sep; Vol. 15 (3), pp. 315-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Mar 07.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

The precision errors of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements are important for monitoring osteoporosis. This study investigated the effect of body mass index (BMI) on precision errors for lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (NOF), total hip (TH), and total body (TB) bone mineral density using the GE Lunar Prodigy. One hundred two women with BMIs ranging from 18.5 to 45.9 kg/m(2) were recruited. Participants had duplicate DXA scans of the LS, left hip, and TB with repositioning between scans. Participants were divided into 3 groups based on their BMI and the percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) calculated for each group. The %CVs for the normal (<25 kg/m(2)) (n=48), overweight (25-30 kg/m(2)) (n=26), and obese (>30 kg/m(2)) (n=28) BMI groups, respectively, were LS BMD: 0.99%, 1.30%, and 1.68%; NOF BMD: 1.32%, 1.37%, and 2.00%; TH BMD: 0.85%, 0.88%, and 1.06%; TB BMD: 0.66%, 0.73%, and 0.91%. Statistically significant differences in precision error between the normal and obese groups were found for LS (p=0.0006), NOF (p=0.005), and TB BMD (p=0.025). These results suggest that serial measurements in obese subjects should be treated with caution because the least significant change may be larger than anticipated.<br /> (Copyright © 2012 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1094-6950
Volume :
15
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22402120
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2012.01.002