Back to Search Start Over

Computer-aided quantitative bone scan assessment of prostate cancer treatment response.

Authors :
Brown MS
Chu GH
Kim HJ
Allen-Auerbach M
Poon C
Bridges J
Vidovic A
Ramakrishna B
Ho J
Morris MJ
Larson SM
Scher HI
Goldin JG
Source :
Nuclear medicine communications [Nucl Med Commun] 2012 Apr; Vol. 33 (4), pp. 384-94.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objective: The development and evaluation of a computer-aided bone scan analysis technique to quantify changes in tumor burden and assess treatment effects in prostate cancer clinical trials.<br />Methods: We have developed and report on a commercial fully automated computer-aided detection (CAD) system. Using this system, scan images were intensity normalized, and then lesions were identified and segmented by anatomic region-specific intensity thresholding. Detected lesions were compared against expert markings to assess the accuracy of the CAD system. The metrics Bone Scan Lesion Area, Bone Scan Lesion Intensity, and Bone Scan Lesion Count were calculated from identified lesions, and their utility in assessing treatment effects was evaluated by analyzing before and after scans from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: 10 treated and 10 untreated. In this study, patients were treated with cabozantinib, a MET/vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor resulting in high rates of resolution of bone scan abnormalities.<br />Results: Our automated CAD system identified bone lesion pixels with 94% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 89% accuracy. Significant differences in changes from baseline were found between treated and untreated groups in all assessed measurements derived by our system. The most significant measure, Bone Scan Lesion Area, showed a median (interquartile range) change from baseline at week 6 of 7.13% (27.61) in the untreated group compared with -73.76% (45.38) in the cabozantinib-treated group (P=0.0003).<br />Conclusion: Our system accurately and objectively identified and quantified metastases in bone scans, allowing for interpatient and intrapatient comparison. It demonstrates potential as an objective measurement of treatment effects, laying the foundation for validation against other clinically relevant outcome measures.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1473-5628
Volume :
33
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Nuclear medicine communications
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22367858
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283503ebf