Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort.

Authors :
Cuzick J
Berney DM
Fisher G
Mesher D
Møller H
Reid JE
Perry M
Park J
Younus A
Gutin A
Foster CS
Scardino P
Lanchbury JS
Stone S
Source :
British journal of cancer [Br J Cancer] 2012 Mar 13; Vol. 106 (6), pp. 1095-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Feb 23.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Background: The natural history of prostate cancer is highly variable and it is difficult to predict. We showed previously that a cell cycle progression (CCP) score was a robust predictor of outcome in a conservatively managed cohort diagnosed by transurethral resection of the prostate. A greater need is to predict outcome in patients diagnosed by needle biopsy.<br />Methods: Total RNA was extracted from paraffin specimens. A CCP score was calculated from expression levels of 31 genes. Clinical variables consisted of centrally re-reviewed Gleason score, baseline prostate-specific antigen level, age, clinical stage, and extent of disease. The primary endpoint was death from prostate cancer.<br />Results: In univariate analysis (n=349), the hazard ratio (HR) for death from prostate cancer was 2.02 (95% CI (1.62, 2.53), P<10(-9)) for a one-unit increase in CCP score. The CCP score was only weakly correlated with standard prognostic factors and in a multivariate analysis, CCP score dominated (HR for one-unit increase=1.65, 95% CI (1.31, 2.09), P=3 × 10(-5)), with Gleason score (P=5 × 10(-4)) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (P=0.017) providing significant additional contributions.<br />Conclusion: For conservatively managed patients, the CCP score is the strongest independent predictor of cancer death outcome yet described and may prove valuable in managing clinically localised prostate cancer.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-1827
Volume :
106
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
British journal of cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22361632
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.39