Back to Search
Start Over
Specificity of four laboratory approaches for cross-sectional HIV incidence determination: analysis of samples from adults with known nonrecent HIV infection from five African countries.
- Source :
-
AIDS research and human retroviruses [AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses] 2012 Oct; Vol. 28 (10), pp. 1177-83. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Assays to determine cross-sectional HIV incidence misclassify some individuals with nonrecent HIV infection as recently infected, overestimating HIV incidence. We analyzed factors associated with false-recent misclassification in five African countries. Samples from 2197 adults from Botswana, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uganda who were HIV infected > 12 months were tested using the (1) BED capture enzyme immunoassay (BED), (2) avidity assay, (3) BED and avidity assays with higher assay cutoffs (BED+ avidity screen), and (4) multiassay algorithm (MAA) that includes the BED+ avidity screen, CD4 cell count, and HIV viral load. Logistic regression identified factors associated with misclassification. False-recent misclassification rates and 95% confidence intervals were BED alone: 7.6% (6.6, 8.8); avidity assay alone: 3.5% (2.7, 4.3); BED+ avidity screen: 2.2% (1.7, 2.9); and MAA: 1.2% (0.8, 1.8). The misclassification rate for the MAA was significantly lower than the rates for the other three methods (each p < 0.05). Misclassification rates were lower when the analysis was limited to subtype C-endemic countries, with the lowest rate obtained for the MAA [0.8% (0.2, 1.9)]. Factors associated with misclassification were for BED alone: country of origin, antiretroviral treatment (ART), viral load, and CD4 cell count; for avidity assay alone: country of origin; for BED+ avidity screen: country of origin and ART. No factors were associated with misclassification using the MAA. In a multivariate model, these associations remained significant with one exception: the association of ART with misclassification was completely attenuated. A MAA that included CD4 cell count and viral load had lower false-recent misclassification than the BED or avidity assays (alone or in combination). Studies are underway to compare the sensitivity of these methods for detection of recent HIV infection.
- Subjects :
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome drug therapy
Adult
Algorithms
Botswana epidemiology
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Female
HIV Seropositivity drug therapy
HIV-1 immunology
Humans
Immunoenzyme Techniques methods
Kenya epidemiology
Logistic Models
Male
Multivariate Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
South Africa epidemiology
Tanzania epidemiology
Uganda epidemiology
Viral Load
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome epidemiology
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome immunology
Anti-HIV Agents therapeutic use
HIV Antibodies blood
HIV Seropositivity epidemiology
HIV Seropositivity immunology
HIV-1 isolation & purification
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1931-8405
- Volume :
- 28
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- AIDS research and human retroviruses
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22283149
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2011.0341