Back to Search Start Over

Significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: a meta-analysis using the International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes population.

Authors :
Franklin SS
Thijs L
Hansen TW
Li Y
Boggia J
Kikuya M
Björklund-Bodegård K
Ohkubo T
Jeppesen J
Torp-Pedersen C
Dolan E
Kuznetsova T
Stolarz-Skrzypek K
Tikhonoff V
Malyutina S
Casiglia E
Nikitin Y
Lind L
Sandoya E
Kawecka-Jaszcz K
Imai Y
Wang J
Ibsen H
O'Brien E
Staessen JA
Source :
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) [Hypertension] 2012 Mar; Vol. 59 (3), pp. 564-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Jan 17.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

The significance of white-coat hypertension in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension remains poorly understood. We analyzed subjects from the population-based 11-country International Database on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes database who had daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP; ABP) and conventional BP (CBP) measurements. After excluding persons with diastolic hypertension by CBP (≥90 mm Hg) or by daytime ABP (≥85 mm Hg), a history of cardiovascular disease, and persons <18 years of age, the present analysis totaled 7295 persons, of whom 1593 had isolated systolic hypertension. During a median follow-up of 10.6 years, there was a total of 655 fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. The analyses were stratified by treatment status. In untreated subjects, those with white-coat hypertension (CBP ≥140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) and subjects with normal BP (CBP <140/<90 mm Hg and ABP <135/<85 mm Hg) were at similar risk (adjusted hazard rate: 1.17 [95% CI: 0.87-1.57]; P=0.29). Furthermore, in treated subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, the cardiovascular risk was similar in elevated conventional and normal daytime systolic BP as compared with those with normal conventional and normal daytime BPs (adjusted hazard rate: 1.10 [95% CI: 0.79-1.53]; P=0.57). However, both treated isolated systolic hypertension subjects with white-coat hypertension (adjusted hazard rate: 2.00; [95% CI: 1.43-2.79]; P<0.0001) and treated subjects with normal BP (adjusted hazard rate: 1.98 [95% CI: 1.49-2.62]; P<0.0001) were at higher risk as compared with untreated normotensive subjects. In conclusion, subjects with sustained hypertension who have their ABP normalized on antihypertensive therapy but with residual white-coat effect by CBP measurement have an entity that we have termed, "treated normalized hypertension." Therefore, one should be cautious in applying the term "white-coat hypertension" to persons receiving antihypertensive treatment.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4563
Volume :
59
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22252396
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.180653