Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of implant-abutment interface misfits after casting and soldering procedures.

Authors :
Neves FD
Elias GA
da Silva-Neto JP
de Medeiros Dantas LC
da Mota AS
Neto AJ
Source :
The Journal of oral implantology [J Oral Implantol] 2014 Apr; Vol. 40 (2), pp. 129-35. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Jan 15.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare vertical and horizontal adjustments of castable abutments after conducting casting and soldering procedures. Twelve external hexagonal implants (3.75 × 10 mm) and their UCLA abutments were divided according their manufacturer and abutment type: PUN (plastic UCLA, Neodent), PUC (plastic UCLA, Conexão), PU3i (plastic UCLA, Biomet 3i), and PUTN (plastic UCLA with Tilite milled base, Neodent). Three infrastructures of a fixed partial implant-supported bridge with 3 elements were produced for each group. The measurements of vertical (VM) and horizontal (HM) misfits were obtained via scanning electron microscopy after completion of casting and soldering. The corresponding values were determined to be biomechanically acceptable to the system, and the results were rated as a percentage. Statistical analysis establishes differences between groups by chi-square after procedures, and McNeman's test was applied to analyze the influence of soldering over casting (α ≤ .05). For the values of VM and HM, respectively, when the casting process was complete, it was observed that 83.25% and 100% (PUTN), 33.3% and 27.75% (PUN), 33.3% and 88.8% (PUC), 33.3% and 94.35% (PU3i) represented acceptable values. After completing the requisite soldering, acceptable values were 50% and 94.35% (PUTN), 16.6% and 77.7% (PUN), 38.55% and 77.7% (PUC), and 27.75% and 94.35% (PU3i). Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the premachined abutments presented more acceptable VM values. The HM values were within acceptable limits before and after the soldering procedure for most groups. Further, the soldering procedure resulted in an increase of VM in all groups.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0160-6972
Volume :
40
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of oral implantology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22242693
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00070