Back to Search
Start Over
Economic evaluation of duloxetine as a first-line treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Mexico.
Economic evaluation of duloxetine as a first-line treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Mexico.
- Source :
-
Journal of medical economics [J Med Econ] 2012; Vol. 15 (2), pp. 233-44. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Dec 05. - Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Objective: To perform an economic evaluation of duloxetine, pregabalin, and both branded and generic gabapentin for managing pain in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) in Mexico.<br />Research Design and Methods: The analysis was conducted using a 3-month decision model, which compares duloxetine 60 mg once daily (DUL), pregabalin 150 mg twice daily (PGB), and gabapentin 600 mg three-times daily (GBP) for PDPN patients with moderate-to-severe pain. A systematic review was performed and placebo-adjusted risk ratios for achieving good pain relief (GPR), adverse events (AE), and withdrawal owing to intolerable AE were calculated. Direct medical costs included drug acquisition and additional visits due to lack of efficacy (poor pain relief) or intolerable AE. Unit costs were taken from local sources. Adherence rates were used to estimate the expected drug costs. All costs are expressed in 2010 Mexican Pesos (MXN). Utility values drawn from published literature were applied to health states. The proportion of patients with GPR and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were assessed.<br />Results: Branded-GBP was dominated by all the other options. PGB was more costly and less effective than DUL. Compared with branded-GBP and PGB, DUL led to savings of 1.01 and 1.74 million MXN (per 1000 patients). The incremental cost per QALY gained with DUL used instead of generic-GBP was $102 433 MXN. This amount is slightly lower than the estimated gross domestic product per capita in Mexico for 2010. During a second-order Monte Carlo simulation, DUL had the highest probability of being cost-effective (61%), followed by generic-GBP (25%) and PGB (14%).<br />Limitations: Study limitations include a short timeframe and using data from different dosage schemes for GBP and PGB.<br />Conclusions: This study suggests that DUL provides overall savings and better health outcomes compared with branded-GBP and PGB. Administering DUL rather than generic-GBP is a cost-effective intervention to manage PDPN in Mexico.
- Subjects :
- Amines economics
Analgesics economics
Analgesics therapeutic use
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids economics
Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors administration & dosage
Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors therapeutic use
Drug Costs
Duloxetine Hydrochloride
Gabapentin
Humans
Mexico
Pregabalin
Thiophenes administration & dosage
Thiophenes therapeutic use
gamma-Aminobutyric Acid analogs & derivatives
gamma-Aminobutyric Acid economics
Diabetic Neuropathies drug therapy
Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors economics
Thiophenes economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1941-837X
- Volume :
- 15
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of medical economics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 22082033
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2011.640730