Back to Search Start Over

Physiological variation as a mechanism for developmental caste-biasing in a facultatively eusocial sweat bee.

Authors :
Kapheim KM
Smith AR
Ihle KE
Amdam GV
Nonacs P
Wcislo WT
Source :
Proceedings. Biological sciences [Proc Biol Sci] 2012 Apr 07; Vol. 279 (1732), pp. 1437-46. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Nov 02.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Social castes of eusocial insects may have arisen through an evolutionary modification of an ancestral reproductive ground plan, such that some adults emerge from development physiologically primed to specialize on reproduction (queens) and others on maternal care expressed as allo-maternal behaviour (workers). This hypothesis predicts that variation in reproductive physiology should emerge from ontogeny and underlie division of labour. To test these predictions, we identified physiological links to division of labour in a facultatively eusocial sweat bee, Megalopta genalis. Queens are larger, have larger ovaries and have higher vitellogenin titres than workers. We then compared queens and workers with their solitary counterparts-solitary reproductive females and dispersing nest foundresses-to investigate physiological variation as a factor in caste evolution. Within dyads, body size and ovary development were the best predictors of behavioural class. Queens and dispersers are larger, with larger ovaries than their solitary counterparts. Finally, we raised bees in social isolation to investigate the influence of ontogeny on physiological variation. Body size and ovary development among isolated females were highly variable, and linked to differences in vitellogenin titres. As these are key physiological predictors of social caste, our results provide evidence for developmental caste-biasing in a facultatively eusocial bee.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2954
Volume :
279
Issue :
1732
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Proceedings. Biological sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22048951
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1652