Cite
[Nephron-sparing surgery is superior to radical nephrectomy in preserving renal function outcome in tumors larger than 4 cm].
MLA
Boulière, F., et al. “[Nephron-Sparing Surgery Is Superior to Radical Nephrectomy in Preserving Renal Function Outcome in Tumors Larger than 4 Cm].” Progres En Urologie : Journal de l’Association Francaise d’urologie et de La Societe Francaise d’urologie, vol. 21, no. 12, Nov. 2011, pp. 842–50. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2011.05.005.
APA
Boulière, F., Crepel, M., Bigot, P., Pignot, G., Bessede, T., de la Taille, A., Salomon, L., Tostain, J., Bellec, L., Soulié, M., Rischmann, P., Bernhard, J.-C., Ferrière, J.-M., Pfister, C., Albouy, B., Colombel, M., Zini, L., Villers, A., Rigaud, J., … Patard, J.-J. (2011). [Nephron-sparing surgery is superior to radical nephrectomy in preserving renal function outcome in tumors larger than 4 cm]. Progres En Urologie : Journal de l’Association Francaise d’urologie et de La Societe Francaise d’urologie, 21(12), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2011.05.005
Chicago
Boulière, F, M Crepel, P Bigot, G Pignot, T Bessede, A de la Taille, L Salomon, et al. 2011. “[Nephron-Sparing Surgery Is Superior to Radical Nephrectomy in Preserving Renal Function Outcome in Tumors Larger than 4 Cm].” Progres En Urologie : Journal de l’Association Francaise d’urologie et de La Societe Francaise d’urologie 21 (12): 842–50. doi:10.1016/j.purol.2011.05.005.