Back to Search Start Over

Lack of relationship between mitochondrial heteroplasmy or variation and childhood obesity.

Authors :
Grant SF
Glessner JT
Bradfield JP
Zhao J
Tirone JE
Berkowitz RI
Hakonarson H
Sondheimer N
Source :
International journal of obesity (2005) [Int J Obes (Lond)] 2012 Jan; Vol. 36 (1), pp. 80-3. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Oct 18.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Mitochondrial electron transport has a central role in regulating energy supply within a cell. We hypothesized that mitochondrial variants or increased levels of mitochondrial heteroplasmy could be associated with common childhood obesity through their effects on mitochondrial function. To investigate this question, we queried two genome-wide genotyped childhood obesity datasets, consisting of 1080 European-American (EA) obese children (defined as BMI ≥ 95th percentile) together with 2500 EA lean controls (defined as BMI<50th percentile) and 1479 African-American (AA) obese children and 1575 AA lean controls. Association was not observed between childhood obesity and any of the assayed mitochondrial polymorphisms in either ethnicity. We also found no observable differences in heteroplasmy between each obese and non-obese group. Finally, we analyzed the quantitative mitochondrial genotype cells generated, whether they exceeded the heteroplasmy threshold or not. With this more lenient test, we found six positions with a significant difference between EA cases and controls (P<1 × 10(-4)). However, when evaluating the AA data set, no differences were noted at these sites, suggesting that our initial observations were because of chance rather than a meaningful relationship to childhood obesity. As such, it is unlikely that common mitochondrial polymorphisms or heteroplasmy have a role in childhood obesity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-5497
Volume :
36
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of obesity (2005)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22005716
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.206