[Results of the modification of antireflux subserosal and submucosal implantation of the ureter into the rectosigmoid urinary reservoir after total cystectomy].

Introduction: Uretero-intestinal anastomisis has a large influence on derivation quality.
Objective: The aim of the study was to present the modified serous lined extramural Abol-Enein method of implantation of low quality ureter into the sigma-rectum pouch and comparison of the results with Le Duc implantation.
Methods: From 1995 to 2009, 62 dilated ureter units were implanted in the detubularized rectosigmoid urinary reservoir. In 28 units Le Duc, and in 34 Abol-Enein method was done. Urinary fistula and ileus were considered as early complications, while late complications included stenosis and reflux pyelonephritis. Frequency of urination was considered as a parameter of functionality.
Results: Transitory urine fistulae occurred only in the ureters implanted according to Le Duc technique in 4/28 (14.2%); the difference between the examined groups was close but still below the level of statistical significance (p = 0.07). Iieus occurred with nearly equal frequency in both groups. Stenosis on the ureteral implantation place was significantly more frequent (p = 0.04) in the Le Duc group 5/28 (21.7%) than in the Abol-Enein group 0/34 (0%). Refluxive pyelonephritis occurred in 3/34 (8.8%) of the Abol-Enein group, and in 5/28 (21.7%) of patients in the Le Duc group. Concerning the daily frequency, there was no difference between the examined groups.
Conclusion: Uretero-intestinal anastomisis of dilated ureters through a serous-lined extramural tunnel decreases the risk of reflux in a considerable number of patients, with an acceptable level of complications. There are several advantages in comparison with Le Duc method.