Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of three predictive rules for assessing severity in elderly patients with CAP.

Authors :
Ochoa-Gondar O
Vila-Corcoles A
Rodriguez-Blanco T
Ramos F
de Diego C
Salsench E
Gil D
Daniel J
Palacios L
Blade J
Source :
International journal of clinical practice [Int J Clin Pract] 2011 Nov; Vol. 65 (11), pp. 1165-72. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Sep 26.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Aim: This study compares the ability of the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and the British Thoracic Society CURB-65 and CRB-65 rules in predicting short-term mortality among elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).<br />Methods: It is a population-based study including all people over 65 years old with a radiographically confirmed CAP in the region of Tarragona (Spain) between 2002 and 2008. Treatment setting and clinical variables were considered for each patient. PSI, CURB-65 and CRB-65 scores were calculated at the moment of diagnosis and 30-day mortality was considered as a main dependent variable. The rules were compared based on sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).<br />Results: Of the total 590 CAP cases, mortality rate was 13.6% (15.3% in hospitalised and 1.4% in outpatient cases; p = 0.001). Mortality increased with increasing PSI score (None in class II, 6,9% in class III, 14,4% in class IV and 29,5% in class V), CURB-65 score (7.5%, 14.5%, 26.7%, 53.3% and 100% for scores 1,2,3,4 and 5 respectively) and CRB-65 score (6.6%, 26.1%, 40.5% and 50% for scores 1,2,3 and 4 respectively). The three rules performed too similarly to predict 30-day mortality, with a ROC area of 0.727 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.79] for the PSI, 0.672 (95% CI: 0.61-0.74) for the CURB-65, and 0.719 (95% CI: 0.65-0.78) for the CRB-65.<br />Conclusion: Our data shows that the analysed rules perform equally well among elderly people with CAP which supports the recommendation for using the simplified CRB-65 severity score among elderly patients in primary care or emergency visits.<br /> (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1742-1241
Volume :
65
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of clinical practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21951687
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02742.x