Back to Search
Start Over
Living donor hepatectomy: the importance of the residual liver volume.
- Source :
-
Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society [Liver Transpl] 2011 Dec; Vol. 17 (12), pp. 1404-11. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Living liver donation is a successful treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease. Most adults are provided with a right lobe graft to ensure a generous recipient liver volume. Some centers are re-exploring the use of smaller left lobe grafts to potentially reduce the donor risk. However, the evidence showing that the donor risk is lower with left lobe donation is inconsistent, and most previous studies have been limited by potential learning curve effects, small sample sizes, or poorly matched comparison groups. To address these deficiencies, we conducted a case-control study. Forty-five consecutive patients who underwent left hepatectomy (LH; n = 4) or left lateral segmentectomy (LLS; n = 41) were compared with matched controls who underwent right hepatectomy (RH) or extended right hepatectomy (ERH). The overall complication rates of the 3 groups were similar (31%-37%). There were no grade 4 or 5 complications. There were more grade 3 complications for the RH patients (13.3%) and the ERH patients (15.6%) versus the LH/LLS patients (2.2%). The extent of the liver resection significantly correlated with the peak international normalized ratio (INR), the days to INR normalization, and the peak bilirubin level. A univariate analysis demonstrated that hepatectomy, the spared volume percentage, and the peak bilirubin level were strongly associated with grade 3 complications. A higher peak bilirubin level, which correlated with a lower residual liver volume, was associated with grade 3 complications in a multivariate analysis (P = 0.005). RH and grade 3 complications were associated with an increased length of stay (>7 days) in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, this analysis demonstrates a significant correlation between the residual liver volume and liver dysfunction, serious adverse postoperative events, and longer hospital stays. Donor safety should be the first priority of all living liver donor programs. We propose that the surgical procedure removing the smallest amount of the liver required to provide adequate recipient graft function should become the standard of care for living liver donation.<br /> (Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Analysis of Variance
Bilirubin blood
Biomarkers blood
Case-Control Studies
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Humans
International Normalized Ratio
Length of Stay
Liver pathology
Liver physiopathology
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Ontario
Organ Size
Postoperative Complications blood
Postoperative Complications pathology
Postoperative Complications physiopathology
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Hepatectomy adverse effects
Liver surgery
Liver Transplantation adverse effects
Living Donors
Postoperative Complications etiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1527-6473
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 21850688
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.22420