Back to Search Start Over

Safety of nerve conduction studies in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors :
Derejko M
Derejko P
Przybylski A
Niewiadomska M
Antczak J
Banach M
Rakowicz M
Szumowski Ł
Walczak F
Source :
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology [Clin Neurophysiol] 2012 Jan; Vol. 123 (1), pp. 211-3. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Jul 01.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objective: A patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may suffer from neuromuscular disorders and may need to undergo a nerve conduction study (NCS). However, a NCS may be a source of electromagnetic interference (EMI). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the interference from NCS used in a standardised test protocol affects ICD function.<br />Methods: Twenty patients (19 males; mean age of 59.8±9.9 years) with implantable ICDs (eight with integrated and 12 with true bipolar leads), treated with amiodarone and with symptoms suggesting neuropathy were included. NCS were conducted using repetitive stimulation with frequency of 2 Hz and single, rectangular pulses of intensity up to 100 mA. Stimulation was performed in standard sites including proximal sites in the arm.<br />Results: The impulses generated NCS were not detected by the ICD, irrespective of the site, rate or stimulus intensity.<br />Conclusions: Standardised test protocol for an NCS is safe in patients with an ICD regardless of the leads type.<br />Significance: Current guidelines which limitate the NCS in patients with ICD may be the subject of revision.<br /> (Copyright © 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-8952
Volume :
123
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21723779
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.06.003