Back to Search
Start Over
Sunitinib plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label trial.
- Source :
-
Clinical breast cancer [Clin Breast Cancer] 2011 Apr; Vol. 11 (2), pp. 82-92. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Apr 11. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Introduction: A multicenter, open-label phase III study was conducted to test whether sunitinib plus paclitaxel prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with HER2(-) advanced breast cancer.<br />Patients and Methods: Patients with HER2(-) advanced breast cancer who were disease free for ≥ 12 months after adjuvant taxane treatment were randomized (1:1; planned enrollment 740 patients) to receive intravenous (I.V.) paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2) every week for 3 weeks in 4-week cycles plus either sunitinib 25 to 37.5 mg every day or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg I.V. every 2 weeks. [corrected]<br />Results: The trial was terminated early because of futility in reaching the primary endpoint as determined by the independent data monitoring committee during an interim futility analysis. At data cutoff, 242 patients had been randomized to sunitinib-paclitaxel and 243 patients to bevacizumab-paclitaxel. Median PFS was shorter with sunitinib-paclitaxel (7.4 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-2.25]; 1-sided P = .999). At a median follow-up of 8.1 months, with 79% of sunitinib-paclitaxel and 87% of bevacizumab-paclitaxel patients alive, overall survival analysis favored bevacizumab-paclitaxel (HR 1.82 [95% CI, 1.16-2.86]; 1-sided P = .996). The objective response rate was 32% in both arms, but median duration of response was shorter with sunitinib-paclitaxel (6.3 vs. 14.8 months). Bevacizumab-paclitaxel was better tolerated than sunitinib-paclitaxel. This was primarily due to a high frequency of grade 3/4, treatment-related neutropenia with sunitinib-paclitaxel (52%) precluding delivery of the prescribed doses of both drugs.<br />Conclusion: The sunitinib-paclitaxel regimen evaluated in this study was clinically inferior to the bevacizumab-paclitaxel regimen and is not a recommended treatment option for patients with advanced breast cancer.<br /> (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Antibodies, Monoclonal adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects
Bevacizumab
Breast Neoplasms mortality
Breast Neoplasms pathology
Carcinoma mortality
Carcinoma pathology
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Indoles adverse effects
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Paclitaxel adverse effects
Pyrroles adverse effects
Sunitinib
Survival Analysis
Antibodies, Monoclonal administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms drug therapy
Carcinoma drug therapy
Indoles administration & dosage
Paclitaxel administration & dosage
Pyrroles administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1938-0666
- Volume :
- 11
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical breast cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 21569994
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2011.03.005