Back to Search Start Over

Vascular hemostasis bandage compared to standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization in children.

Authors :
Waragai T
Morgan G
Ralston T
Chaturvedi R
Lee KJ
Benson L
Source :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions [Catheter Cardiovasc Interv] 2011 Aug 01; Vol. 78 (2), pp. 262-6. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Apr 28.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Background: Femoral venous and arterial approaches are the commonly used to obtain vascular access for pediatric cardiac catheterization. Hemostasis after catheter removal is usually obtained by manual compression. However, this technique is time consuming and at times painful. Although several closure devices are available for adults, they are not widely applicable in children.<br />Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a microporous polysaccharide hemospheres hemostasis (MPH) bandage compared to manual compression.<br />Methods: Prospective randomized study, involving 112 children after cardiac catheterization. One group received the MPH bandage, another manual compression. Compression time was predetermined by the size of sheath plus one minute. Success was defined as no bleeding or hematoma formation. If bleeding continued, compression was continued as needed and time to hemostasis recorded. Informed consent was obtained prior to randomization. Group comparisons were performed with a Student's t, Pearson's Chi Square, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate.<br />Results: Fewer children required a compression time of >15 min (P = 0.006) and more had a shorter time to hemostasis (P = 0.003) in the MPH group for venous access control. Time to hemostasis was also shorter in the MPH (P = 0.048) in arterial access cases, but the number of children requiring a compression time >15 min was the same. Complications including hematoma formation in each group were similar.<br />Conclusions: The MPH bandage allows a shorter time to achieve hemostasis compared to manual compression. This improves turnaround time and laboratory efficiency.<br /> (Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-726X
Volume :
78
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21538780
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23057