Back to Search Start Over

United States (US) multi-center study to assess the validity and reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III).

Authors :
Anderson KD
Acuff ME
Arp BG
Backus D
Chun S
Fisher K
Fjerstad JE
Graves DE
Greenwald K
Groah SL
Harkema SJ
Horton JA 3rd
Huang MN
Jennings M
Kelley KS
Kessler SM
Kirshblum S
Koltenuk S
Linke M
Ljungberg I
Nagy J
Nicolini L
Roach MJ
Salles S
Scelza WM
Read MS
Reeves RK
Scott MD
Tansey KE
Theis JL
Tolfo CZ
Whitney M
Williams CD
Winter CM
Zanca JM
Source :
Spinal cord [Spinal Cord] 2011 Aug; Vol. 49 (8), pp. 880-5. Date of Electronic Publication: 2011 Mar 29.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Study Design: Multi-center, prospective, cohort study.<br />Objectives: To assess the validity and reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) in measuring functional ability in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).<br />Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals in the United States (US).<br />Methods: Functional ability was measured with the SCIM III during the first week of admittance into inpatient acute rehabilitation and within one week of discharge from the same rehabilitation program. Motor and sensory neurologic impairment was measured with the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the default functional measure currently used in most US hospitals, was used as a comparison standard for the SCIM III. Statistical analyses were used to test the validity and reliability of the SCIM III.<br />Results: Total agreement between raters was above 70% on most SCIM III tasks and all κ-coefficients were statistically significant (P<0.001). The coefficients of Pearson correlation between the paired raters were above 0.81 and intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.81. Cronbach's-α was above 0.7, with the exception of the respiration task. The coefficient of Pearson correlation between the FIM and SCIM III was 0.8 (P<0.001). For the respiration and sphincter management subscale, the SCIM III was more responsive to change, than the FIM (P<0.0001).<br />Conclusion: Overall, the SCIM III is a reliable and valid measure of functional change in SCI. However, improved scoring instructions and a few modifications to the scoring categories may reduce variability between raters and enhance clinical utility.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-5624
Volume :
49
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Spinal cord
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21445081
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.20