Back to Search
Start Over
Dental and skeletal outcomes for Class II surgical-orthodontic treatment: A comparison between novice and experienced clinicians.
- Source :
-
American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics [Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop] 2011 Mar; Vol. 139 (3), pp. 305-15. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Introduction: The information that details dental changes accompanying presurgical and postsurgical orthodontic treatment during orthognathic surgery treatment is disappointing and results in less than ideal surgical change, but it is largely derived from university clinic samples with patients treated by residents (clinical novices). In this study, we examined similar treatments performed by experienced practitioners and compared them with the novices' results.<br />Methods: A sample of 72 Class II subjects treated by practitioners with a mean of 26.7 years of experience was selected. Inclusion criteria were consecutively treated surgical-orthodontic patients with mandibular advancement, rigid fixation, and good-quality lateral cephalograms. Pretreatment skeletal and dental variables were compared with those from a sample treated by novices in a previous study. Presurgical and final analyses were performed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with pretreatment values as the covariate. An efficacy analyses for treatment phase and study comparisons was the final component.<br />Results: The novices treated patients with significantly more severe Class II skeletal problems. For both studies, there were significant positive changes in the position of the mandible. The ANCOVA analysis showed that the experienced practitioners managed the bodily position of the maxillary incisors more effectively. The efficacy analysis showed no statistically significant differences between novices and experienced practitioners. For both novices and experienced practitioners, according to the ANB changes, nonideal incisor decompensation led to less than ideal final mandibular positions.<br />Conclusions: The dental and skeletal mean changes and efficacy analysis for both novices and experienced practitioners showed that presurgical orthodontic treatment often does not fully decompensate the incisors; this then limits the surgical outcome.<br /> (Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Cephalometry methods
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted methods
Incisor pathology
Internship and Residency
Male
Malocclusion, Angle Class II pathology
Malocclusion, Angle Class II therapy
Mandible pathology
Mandibular Advancement
Maxilla pathology
Nasal Bone pathology
Orthodontics classification
Orthodontics education
Orthopedic Fixation Devices
Sella Turcica pathology
Treatment Outcome
Vertical Dimension
Clinical Competence
Malocclusion, Angle Class II surgery
Orthodontics, Corrective
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6752
- Volume :
- 139
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 21392684
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.024