Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of mouthrinse and dentifrice regimens in an in situ erosion remineralisation model.
- Source :
-
Journal of dentistry [J Dent] 2010 Nov; Vol. 38 Suppl 3, pp. S37-44. - Publication Year :
- 2010
-
Abstract
- Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of dentifrice/mouthrinse regimens in a clinical in situ erosion remineralisation model.<br />Methods: Thirty-six subjects completed a randomised single-blind cross-over trial of five treatment regimens. R1: Dentifrice A [1450 ppm fluoride as the sodium salt (NaF), 50000 ppm potassium nitrate (KNO(3))] plus 450 ppm fluoride (NaF) rinse; R2: Dentifrice A plus sterile water rinse; R3: Dentifrice B (fluoride-free Dentifrice A) plus sterile water rinse; R4: Dentifrice B plus 450 ppm fluoride (NaF) rinse; R5: Dentifrice C (1000 ppm fluorine as sodium monofluorophosphate, 450 ppm fluoride as NaF) plus sterile water rinse. Subjects wore a palatal appliance holding eight pre-demineralised enamel blocks. A 60 min interval separated in vivo use of dentifrice and rinse with the appliance retained in situ for 4h. Efficacy endpoints were percentage surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) following remineralisation, and percentage relative erosion resistance (%RER) of recovered specimens following a subsequent in vitro erosive challenge. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and selected twin-tailed t-tests.<br />Results: Mean %SMHR (±SE) was (a)42.14±1.39, (b)38.02±1.39, (c)30.57±1.39, (b)37.75±1.39 and (c)30.88±1.39 for regimens R1-R5 respectively (different superscripts denote statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between treatment regimens). Mean %RER (±SE) was (a)-2.88±2.16, (b)-14.54±2.16, (c)-40.05±2.16, (a)-3.76±2.16 and (d)-29.48±2.16 for regimens R1-R5 respectively. R1 elicited statistically significantly greater %SMHR versus all comparator regimens (p<0.01), and conferred statistically significantly greater %RER than comparator regimens (p<0.0001) except R4 (p=0.70).<br />Conclusions: The combination treatment of dentifrice A containing 1450 ppm fluoride with the 450 ppm fluoride mouthrinse elicited significant enhancements in rehardening of incipient enamel erosive lesions, and significantly increased their subsequent resistance to a second erosive challenge.<br /> (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Combined Modality Therapy
Cross-Over Studies
Dental Enamel ultrastructure
Dentifrices chemistry
Dentin Sensitivity prevention & control
Drug Combinations
Drug Delivery Systems methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mouthwashes chemistry
Nitrates administration & dosage
Potassium Compounds administration & dosage
Reference Values
Single-Blind Method
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surface Properties
Young Adult
Dental Enamel drug effects
Dentifrices therapeutic use
Fluorides, Topical administration & dosage
Mouthwashes therapeutic use
Tooth Erosion prevention & control
Tooth Remineralization methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-176X
- Volume :
- 38 Suppl 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of dentistry
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 21256403
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(11)70007-0