Back to Search Start Over

Pathologic characteristics of hysterectomy specimens in women undergoing hysterectomy after global endometrial ablation.

Authors :
Carey ET
El-Nashar SA
Hopkins MR
Creedon DJ
Cliby WA
Famuyide AO
Source :
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology [J Minim Invasive Gynecol] 2011 Jan-Feb; Vol. 18 (1), pp. 96-9.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Study Objective: To describe uterine pathologic features in women who underwent hysterectomy because of failed global endometrial ablation (GEA).<br />Design: Retrospective cohort study from 1998 through 2005 (Canadian Task Force classification III).<br />Setting: Tertiary referral center.<br />Patients: Sixty-nine women who underwent hysterectomy because of GEA failure.<br />Interventions: Pathology reports were available for 67 patients. Descriptions of hysterectomy specimens after GEA were reviewed.<br />Measurements and Main Results: Rates of pathologic findings in hysterectomy specimens after failed GEA were determined. Reasons for hysterectomy in the 67 patients with available pathology reports were bleeding in 34 (51%), pain in 19 (28%), and bleeding and pain in 14 (21%). The pathology reports of these specimens showed leiomyomas in 33 specimens (49%); intramural myomas were present in 15 women (44%) who underwent hysterectomy because of bleeding and 8 women (42%) who underwent hysterectomy because of pain. Hematometra was identified in 7 pathologic specimens (10%). Specifically, hematometra was identified in specimens from 5 of 19 women who underwent hysterectomy because of pain (26%).<br />Conclusion: Hematometra was a significant finding in women who underwent hysterectomy because of persistent pain after GEA. A possible pathologic predictor of GEA failure may be intramural leiomyomas.<br /> (Copyright © 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1553-4669
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21195959
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.10.004