Back to Search
Start Over
Comparative Effectiveness and Toxicity of Statins Among HIV-Infected Patients.
- Source :
-
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America [Clin Infect Dis] 2011 Feb 01; Vol. 52 (3), pp. 387-95. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Dec 28. - Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Background: dyslipidemia is common and is often treated with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins). Little is known about the comparative effectiveness of statins among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. This study compared the effectiveness and toxicity of statins among HIV-infected patients in clinical care.<br />Methods: we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients starting their initial statin medications at 2 large HIV clinics (N = 700). The primary observation was change in lipid levels during statin therapy. Secondary observations included whether individualized National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goals for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels were reached, and toxicity rates. We used linear regression to examine change in lipid levels, controlling for baseline lipid values and demographic and clinical characteristics. We conducted secondary analyses using propensity scores to address confounding by indication.<br />Results: the most commonly prescribed statins were atorvastatin (N = 303), pravastatin (N = 280), and rosuvastatin (N = 95). One year after starting a statin therapy, patients who received atorvastatin or rosuvastatin had significantly greater decreases in total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C than patients on pravastatin. The likelihood of reaching NCEP goals for LDL-C levels was higher with the use of rosuvastatin (OR 2.1; P = .03) and atorvastatin (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; P = .001) compared with that of pravastatin. The likelihood of reaching NCEP goals for non-HDL-C levels was higher for rosuvastatin (OR 2.3; P = .045) but not atorvastatin (OR, 1.5; P = .1) compared with pravastatin. Toxicity rates were similar for all 3 statins: 7.3% for atorvastatin, 6.1% for pravastatin, and 5.3% for rosuvastatin.<br />Conclusions: our findings suggest that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are preferable to pravastatin for treatment of HIV-infected patients with dyslipidemia, due to greater declines in total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C, with similar lower toxicity rates.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atorvastatin
Cholesterol blood
Cohort Studies
Female
Fluorobenzenes adverse effects
Fluorobenzenes pharmacology
Fluorobenzenes therapeutic use
Heptanoic Acids adverse effects
Heptanoic Acids pharmacology
Heptanoic Acids therapeutic use
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Pyrimidines adverse effects
Pyrimidines pharmacology
Pyrimidines therapeutic use
Pyrroles adverse effects
Pyrroles pharmacology
Pyrroles therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Rosuvastatin Calcium
Serum chemistry
Sulfonamides adverse effects
Sulfonamides pharmacology
Sulfonamides therapeutic use
Dyslipidemias drug therapy
HIV Infections complications
HIV Infections drug therapy
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors adverse effects
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors pharmacology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1537-6591
- Volume :
- 52
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 21189273
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq111