Back to Search Start Over

Is concurrent radiation therapy required in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus? A randomised phase II trial.

Authors :
Burmeister BH
Thomas JM
Burmeister EA
Walpole ET
Harvey JA
Thomson DB
Barbour AP
Gotley DC
Smithers BM
Source :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) [Eur J Cancer] 2011 Feb; Vol. 47 (3), pp. 354-60.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for resectable oesophageal cancer have been shown to improve overall survival in meta-analyses. There are limited data comparing these preoperative therapies. We report the outcomes of a randomised phase II trial comparing preoperative CT and CRT for resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction.<br />Methods: Patients were randomised to receive preoperative CT with cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) and infusional 5 fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 and 21, or preoperative CRT with the same drugs accompanied by concurrent radiation therapy commencing on day 21 of chemotherapy and the 5 fluorouracil reduced to 800 mg/m(2)/d. The radiation dose was 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. The endpoints were toxicity, response rates, resection (R) status, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life.<br />Results: Seventy-five patients were enrolled on the study: 36 received preoperative CT and 39 preoperative CRT. Toxicity was similar for CT and CRT. Eight patients (11%) did not proceed to resection. The histopathological response rate (CRT 31% versus CT 8%, p = 0.01) and R1 resection rate (CRT 0% versus CT 11%, p = 0.04) favoured those receiving CRT. The median PFS was 14 and 26 months for CT and CRT respectively (p = 0.37). The median OS was 29 months for CT compared with 32 months for CRT (p = 0.83).<br />Conclusions: Despite no difference in survival, the improvement from preoperative CRT with respect to margin involvement makes this treatment a reasonable option for bulky, locally advanced resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.<br /> (Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0852
Volume :
47
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21084184
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.009