Back to Search Start Over

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and vein graft failure and the therapeutic potential of ET-1 receptor antagonists.

Authors :
Jeremy JY
Shukla N
Angelini GD
Wan S
Source :
Pharmacological research [Pharmacol Res] 2011 Jun; Vol. 63 (6), pp. 483-9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Nov 05.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Despite the exploration of a large number of disparate drugs in animal models and clinical trials, no pharmacological intervention, with the exception of aggressive lipid lowering therapy has reduced late vein graft failure in man. The importance of devising more effective strategies is exemplified by the enormous economic consequences of vein graft failure. Worldwide, there are currently more than 1,000,000 coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) operations a year, the same number of patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass for vascular diseases of the lower limb. The pathophysiology of vein graft failure is complex, involving disparate factors that include adhesion of platelets and leukocytes, rheological forces, metalloproteinase expression, proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, neointima formation, oxidative stress, hypoxia and neural re-organisation. Although this diverse etiology may seem to preclude any single drug type as being effective in mediating vein graft failure: one factor that is involved in every facet of vein graft pathobiology is endothelin-1 (ET-1). As such a single drug type (ET(A) antagonist) may prove to be the magic bullet in this scenario. Thus, in this review, we will consider the etiology of vein graft disease in relation to ET-1 and will then present an argument (with evidence) that specific ET(A) receptor antagonists constitute a potentially effective means of preventing vein graft failure.<br /> (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1096-1186
Volume :
63
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pharmacological research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
21056670
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2010.10.018