Back to Search Start Over

Gasping in response to basic resuscitation efforts: observation in a Swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors :
Zuercher M
Ewy GA
Otto CW
Hilwig RW
Bobrow BJ
Clark L
Chikani V
Sanders AB
Berg RA
Kern KB
Source :
Critical care research and practice [Crit Care Res Pract] 2010; Vol. 2010. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 May 31.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the effect of basic resuscitation efforts on gasping and of gasping on survival. Methods. This is secondary analysis of a previously reported study comparing continuous chest compressions (CCC CPR) versus chest compressions plus ventilation (30:2 CPR) on survival. 64 swine were randomized to 1 of these 2 basic CPR approaches after either short (3 or 4 minutes) or long (5 or 6 minutes) durations of untreated VF. At 12 minutes of VF, all received the same Guidelines 2005 Advanced Cardiac Life Support. Neurologically status was evaluated at 24 hours. A score of 1 is normal, 2 is abnormal, such as not eating or drinking normally, unsteady gait, or slight resistance to restraint, 3 severely abnormal, where the animal is recumbent and unable to stand, 4 is comatose, and 5 is dead. For this analysis a neurological outcome score of 1 or 2 was classified as "good", and a score of 3, 4, or 5 was classified as "poor." Results. Gasping was more likely to continue or if absent, to resume in the animals with short durations of untreated VF before basic resuscitation efforts. With long durations of untreated VF, the frequency of gasping and survival was better in swine receiving CCC CPR. In the absence of frequent gasping, intact survival was rare in the long duration of untreated VF group. Conclusions. Gasping is an important phenomenon during basic resuscitation efforts for VF arrest and in this model was more frequent with CCC-CPR.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2090-1313
Volume :
2010
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Critical care research and practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20948884
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/351638