[Psychopathology, quality of life and social functioning in dialysis treatment and kidney transplantation patients].

Objectives: Psychiatric evaluation of organ transplant candidates is now routinely proposed also in Italy. This study purposed to assess the psychological status in patients on hemo-dialysis, peritoneal dialysis and renal transplantation; moreover other purpose is to investigate the possible differences among the three groups.
Materials and Methods: 157 subjects were consecutively enrolled, to the service of U.O. Trapianti d'Organo of San Salvatore Hospital in L'Aquila (Italy), between October 2007 and August 2009; 127 were in dialysis (80.9%), of which 101 were in hemodialysis (64.3%) (HD group) and 26 in peritoneal dialysis (16.6%) (PD group) and 30 (19.1%) Kidney transplant (PT group). The subjects were examined with clinical evaluation and through the following psychometric instruments: HAM-D, HAM-A, Jalowiec Coping Scale, STAI-Y1, STAI-Y2, DISS, SF-36.
Results: 30% out of our sample showed the presence of some psychopathological signs and symptoms, especially depression and anxiety. At HAM-D there were no differences between HD group (6.73; DS + 5.58) and PD group (5.27, DS + 5.63); the mean value at HAM-D in PT group was 4.4 (DS + 3.16) (p < 0.05). At HAM-A there were no differences between three groups. The HD group showed an higher value at STAI-Y1 (38.61; DS + 10.64) than PD (34.95; DS + 6.75) and PT (33.89; DS + 6.14) groups (p < 0.05). The quality of life (physical role, general health, vitality and role emotional) was lower in HD and PD groups, higher in group PT. The HD e PD groups showed a higher level of disability than PT group (p < 0.05). All subjects used "positive: coping styles.
Conclusions: We consider essential to investigate the issues observed in this study, with the need to integrate psychosocial and functional needs assessment within a course of diagnosis and treatment for people who are undergoing dialysis procedures, or after waiting for a transplantation. Dialysis affects the quality of life, leading to limitations in activities and high level of disability. The PT group showed better quality of life and less impairment in functioning in the investigated areas. If the impact of psychological and/or psychiatric aid remains difficult to appraise, these results emphasize the impact of psychological status and the appropriateness of psychosocial support intervention on patients facing the transplant process or in dialysis treatments.