Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of alignment methods and data pretreatments on the determination of the most important peaks for the discrimination of coffee varieties Arabica and Robusta using gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy.

Authors :
Hovell AM
Pereira EJ
Arruda NP
Rezende CM
Source :
Analytica chimica acta [Anal Chim Acta] 2010 Sep 30; Vol. 678 (2), pp. 160-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Sep 17.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Coffee samples were analyzed by GC/MS in order to determine the most important peaks for the discrimination of the varieties Arabica and Robusta. The resulting peak tables from chromatographic analysis were aligned and pretreated before being submitted to multivariate analysis. A rapid and easy-to-perform peak alignment procedure, which does not require advanced programming skills to use, was compared with the tedious manual alignment procedure. The influence of three types of data pretreatment, normalization, logarithmic and square root transformations and their combinations, on the variables selected as most important by the regression coefficients of partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), are shown. Test samples different from those used in the calibration and comparison with the substances already known as being responsible for Arabica and Robusta coffees discrimination were used to determine the best pretreatments for both datasets. The data pretreatment consisting of square root transformation followed by normalization (RN) was chosen as being the most appropriate. The results obtained showed that the much quicker automated aligned method could be used as a substitute for the manually aligned method, allowing all the peaks in the chromatogram to be used for multivariate analysis.<br /> (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-4324
Volume :
678
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Analytica chimica acta
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20888447
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.08.029