Back to Search Start Over

Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of shallow residual neuromuscular block.

Authors :
Schaller SJ
Fink H
Ulm K
Blobner M
Source :
Anesthesiology [Anesthesiology] 2010 Nov; Vol. 113 (5), pp. 1054-60.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Introduction: Sugammadex effectively and rapidly reverses deep to moderate rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. However, the required dose of sugammadex for smaller degrees of residual block is unknown. Therefore we investigated the efficacy of sugammadex and neostigmine at a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.5.<br />Methods: After ethics committee (Munich, Germany) approval and written informed consent were obtained, 99 patients were anesthetized with propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed by calibrated electromyography. At recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.5, patients randomly received sugammadex (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg), neostigmine (5, 8, 15, 25, or 40 μg/kg), or saline. The time between study drug injection, at TOF ratio of 0.5, and postoperative TOF ratio of 0.9 was measured. The dose-response relationship was analyzed with a biexponential model using the dose as the independent variable and the logarithm of the recovery time as the dependent variable. Effective doses were interpolated from regression models.<br />Results: Sugammadex, 0.22 mg/kg, is able to reverse a TOF ratio of 0.5 to 0.9 or higher in an average time of 2 min. Within 5 min, 95% of patients reach this TOF ratio. Neostigmine, 34 μg/kg, is able to reverse a TOF ratio of 0.5 to 0.9 or higher within 5 min. No recurarization was observed.<br />Conclusions: Sugammadex, 0.22 mg/kg, and neostigmine, 34 μg/kg, effectively and comparably reverse a rocuronium-induced shallow residual neuromuscular block at a TOF ratio of 0.5.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-1175
Volume :
113
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Anesthesiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20885293
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f4182a