Why won't defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term 'conventional treatment' for carcinoma in situ?

MLA

Chalmers, Iain. “Why Won’t Defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry Provide Evidence to Justify Their Use of the Term ‘Conventional Treatment’ for Carcinoma in Situ?” The New Zealand Medical Journal, vol. 123, no. 1319, July 2010, pp. 109–12. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=cmedm&AN=20717187&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Chalmers, I. (2010). Why won’t defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry provide evidence to justify their use of the term “conventional treatment” for carcinoma in situ? The New Zealand Medical Journal, 123(1319), 109–112.

Chicago

Chalmers, Iain. 2010. “Why Won’t Defenders of the Cartwright Inquiry Provide Evidence to Justify Their Use of the Term ‘Conventional Treatment’ for Carcinoma in Situ?” The New Zealand Medical Journal 123 (1319): 109–12. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=cmedm&AN=20717187&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.