Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials.

MLA

Rahn, David D., et al. “Systematic Review Highlights Difficulty Interpreting Diverse Clinical Outcomes in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Trials.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 3, Mar. 2011, pp. 293–300. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.017.

APA

Rahn, D. D., Abed, H., Sung, V. W., Matteson, K. A., Rogers, R. G., Morrill, M. Y., Barber, M. D., Schaffer, J. I., Wheeler, T. L., 2nd, Balk, E. M., & Uhlig, K. (2011). Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(3), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.017

Chicago

Rahn, David D, Husam Abed, Vivian W Sung, Kristen A Matteson, Rebecca G Rogers, Michelle Y Morrill, Matthew D Barber, et al. 2011. “Systematic Review Highlights Difficulty Interpreting Diverse Clinical Outcomes in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Trials.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64 (3): 293–300. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.017.