Back to Search Start Over

Nanoparticle cytotoxicity depends on intracellular solubility: comparison of stabilized copper metal and degradable copper oxide nanoparticles.

Authors :
Studer AM
Limbach LK
Van Duc L
Krumeich F
Athanassiou EK
Gerber LC
Moch H
Stark WJ
Source :
Toxicology letters [Toxicol Lett] 2010 Sep 01; Vol. 197 (3), pp. 169-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 May 26.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Metal nanoparticles have distinctly different chemical and physical properties than currently investigated oxides. Since pure metallic nanoparticles are igniting at air, carbon stabilized copper nanoparticles were used as representative material for this class. Using copper as a representative example, we compare the cytotoxicity of copper metal nanoparticles stabilized by a carbon layer to copper oxide nanoparticles using two different cell lines. Keeping the copper exposure dose constant, the two forms of copper showed a distinctly different response. Whilst copper oxide had already been reported to be highly cytotoxic, carbon-coated copper nanoparticles were much less cytotoxic and more tolerated. Measuring the two material's intra- and extracellular solubility in model buffers explained this difference on the basis of altered copper release when supplying copper metal or the corresponding oxide particles to the cells. Control experiments using pure carbon nanoparticles were used to exclude significant surface effects. Reference experiments with ionic copper solutions confirmed a similar response of cultures if exposed to copper oxide nanoparticles or ionic copper. These observations are in line with a Trojan horse-type mechanism and illustrate the dominating influence of physico-chemical parameters on the cytotoxicity of a given metal.<br /> ((c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-3169
Volume :
197
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Toxicology letters
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20621582
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.05.012