Back to Search Start Over

Reproducibility and validity of bioimpedance spectroscopy for tracking changes in total body water: implications for repeated measurements.

Authors :
Moon JR
Stout JR
Smith AE
Tobkin SE
Lockwood CM
Kendall KL
Graef JL
Fukuda DH
Costa PB
Stock MS
Young KC
Tucker PS
Kim E
Herda TJ
Walter AA
Ferguson SL
Sherk VD
Cramer JT
Source :
The British journal of nutrition [Br J Nutr] 2010 Nov; Vol. 104 (9), pp. 1384-94. Date of Electronic Publication: 2010 Jul 12.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) has been used to track changes in total body water (TBW). Accurate TBW estimations can be influenced by both methodological and biological factors. One methodological variation that contributes to BIS TBW errors is the electrode placement. The purpose of the present study was to compare the reproducibility and validity of fixed-distance electrode placements (5 cm) with the standard single-site electrode placements. Twenty-nine subjects (fifteen men and fourteen women) participated in the reproducibility study, while sixty-nine subjects (thirty-three men and thirty-six women) participated in the validity study. The reproducibility study included two measurements that were taken 24 h apart, while the validity study consisted of a 12-week exercise intervention with measurements taken at weeks 1 and 12. TBW was estimated using BIS and 2H techniques. Reproducibility results indicated that fixed-distance electrodes reduced the day-to-day standard error of the measurement in men (from 1·13 to 0·81 litres) but not in women (0·47 litres). sem values were lower for women than for men, suggesting that BIS TBW estimates are sex dependent. Validity results produced similar accurate findings (mean difference < 0·21 litres). However, fixed-distance electrodes improved delta TBW errors (mean difference improvements>0·04 litres in men, women, and men and women combined). When tracking changes in TBW, fixed-distance electrodes may reduce reproducibility errors and allow for smaller changes to be detected. However, the reduction of reproducibility errors may be greater for men than for women. Therefore, reproducibility calculations should be based on the sex of the sample population.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1475-2662
Volume :
104
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The British journal of nutrition
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20619077
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510002254