Back to Search Start Over

Cemented hip designs are a reasonable option in young patients.

Authors :
Busch V
Klarenbeek R
Slooff T
Schreurs BW
Gardeniers J
Source :
Clinical orthopaedics and related research [Clin Orthop Relat Res] 2010 Dec; Vol. 468 (12), pp. 3214-20.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

Background: Young patients with degenerative cartilage disease of the hip remain a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Different treatment options are available of which uncemented hips are the most popular owing to long-term concerns about cemented implants. As an alternative, we have used a cemented hip design in combination with bone impaction grafting in patients with acetabular defects.<br />Questions/purposes: We therefore determined the survival rates and radiological failures of cemented THA in patients younger than 30 years and reported clinical scores, complications and current state of the revised THAs.<br />Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all 48 patients (69 hips) younger than 30 years at the time of surgery who had a primary cemented THA performed between 1988 and 2004. Acetabular defects were reconstructed using bone impaction grafting in 29 hips. Mean age at surgery was 24.6 years (range, 16-29 years). Revisions were documented, radiographs were analyzed, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival for different end points. No patient was lost to followup, three patients (four hips) had died. Minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 8.4 years; range, 2-18 years).<br />Results: Eight hips were revised (three for infection and five for aseptic loosening) and one hip dislocated for which open reduction was necessary. One additional cup was considered a radiographic failure. The 10-year survival was 83% (95% confidence interval, 69%-92%) with revision for any reason as the end point and 90% (95% confidence interval, 77%-96%) with revision for aseptic loosening.<br />Conclusions: We found a high survival rate of these cemented THA in young patients. In young patients with acetabular bone defects we recommend reconstruction using cemented implants with bone impaction grafting.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-1132
Volume :
468
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical orthopaedics and related research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
20405346
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1355-z