Back to Search
Start Over
Craniocervical fixation with occipital condyle screws: biomechanical analysis of a novel technique.
- Source :
-
Spine [Spine (Phila Pa 1976)] 2010 Apr 20; Vol. 35 (9), pp. 931-8. - Publication Year :
- 2010
-
Abstract
- Study Design: A human cadaveric biomechanical study comparing craniocervical fixation techniques.<br />Objective: To quantitatively compare the biomechanical stability of a new technique for occipitocervical fixation using the occipital condyles with an established method for craniocervical spine fusion.<br />Summary of Background Data: Stabilization of the occipitocervical junction remains a challenge. The occiput does not easily accommodate instrumentation because of access and spatial constraints. In fact, the area available for the implant fixation is limited and can be restricted further when a suboccipital craniectomy has been performed, posing a challenge to current fixation techniques. Occipital screws are also associated with the potential for intracranial complications.<br />Methods: Six fresh frozen cadaveric specimens occiput-C4 were tested intact, after destabilization and after fixation as follows: (1) occipital plate with C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pars screws and (2) occipital condyle screws with C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pars screws. Specimens were loaded in a custom spine testing apparatus and subjected to the following tests, all performed under 50-N unconstrained axial preload: flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation at 1.5 Nm. The constructs were statistically compared with a one-way analysis of variance and compared with the intact condition.<br />Results: Motions were reduced by approximately 80% compared with the intact condition for both configurations under all motions. There were no statistically significant differences in the range of motion (ROM) between the 2 instrumentation conditions. The mean values indicated decreased ROM with the novel occipital condyle screw construct in comparison with the standard occipital plate and rod system.<br />Conclusion: Craniocervical stabilization using occipital condyle screws as the sole cephalad fixation point is biomechanically equivalent with regard to the modes tested (ROM and stiffness) to the standard occipital plate construct.
- Subjects :
- Atlanto-Axial Joint surgery
Atlanto-Occipital Joint physiology
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Plates
Bone Screws
Humans
Range of Motion, Articular physiology
Spinal Fusion instrumentation
Atlanto-Occipital Joint surgery
Cervical Vertebrae surgery
Internal Fixators
Occipital Bone surgery
Spinal Fusion methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1528-1159
- Volume :
- 35
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Spine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 20375778
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c16f9a