Back to Search
Start Over
Anaesthesia for phacosemulsification surgery: is it as comfortable as we think?
- Source :
-
Journal of perioperative practice [J Perioper Pract] 2010 Jan; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 30-3. - Publication Year :
- 2010
-
Abstract
- We report an observational prospective study to determine which local anaesthetic technique gave the most comfort during phacoemulsification (cataract) surgery. 1835 patients were recruited. 61.8% were female. Peribulbar (18.2%), subtenons (28.6%), and topical (53.2%) anaesthesia was used. The pain score was assessed by the visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) which ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse possible pain). The lowest mean pain score occurred in the subtenons group, mean VAPS 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.3). The mean pain scores for topical and peribulbar anaesthesia were 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.7) and 0.59 (95% CI 0.41-0.76) respectively. Subtenons anaesthesia gave the most comfort during phacoemulsification. Patients experienced more discomfort with 2nd eye surgery. Older patients and males had a higher pain threshold in all three anaesthetic groups.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia, Local psychology
Attitude to Health
Female
Humans
Injections, Intraocular
Intraoperative Complications diagnosis
Intraoperative Complications etiology
Intraoperative Complications psychology
Male
Medical Audit
Middle Aged
Nursing Methodology Research
Pain diagnosis
Pain etiology
Pain psychology
Pain Measurement
Phacoemulsification psychology
Prospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Anesthesia, Local methods
Intraoperative Complications prevention & control
Pain prevention & control
Phacoemulsification adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1750-4589
- Volume :
- 20
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of perioperative practice
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 20225719
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/175045891002000105